Chlorine-36 evidence for the Mono Lake event in the Summit GRIP ice core
By G. Wagner, J. Beer, C. Laj, C. Kissel, J. Masarik, R. Muscheler, H. Synal. 2000
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed721a8fd55631de167e9cd7100c7c127ef025c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Atmospheric Science
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Radiocarbon Levels in the Iceland Sea from 25–53 kyr and their Link to the Earth's Magnetic Field Intensity (2000, methodology): “This assumption is corroborated by the 36Cl flux data from the GRIP ice core (Wagner et al. 2000) and by a Bahamian speleothem 14C record (Richards et al. submitted; Beck et al. submitted), both of which show similar values for the Mono Lake and the Laschamp Event, higher than those obtained from…”
- South Atlantic and North Atlantic geomagnetic paleointensity stacks (0-80 ka): implications for inter-hemispheric correlation (2002, background): “Comparisons between the Cl flux and sedimentary paleointensity records indicate a maximum time offsets of around 500 yr (Wagner et al., 2000).”
- Ar/Ar ages from transitionally magnetized lavas on La Palma, Canary Islands, and the geomagnetic instability timescale (2002, background): “A cosmogenic 36Cl peak in the GRIP ice core, a proxy for a minimum in the geomagnetic dipole field [Wagner et al., 2000], and AMS 14C ages from Arctic Ocean cores [Nowaczyk and Knies, 2000] suggest the Mono Lake excursion occurred between 32–25 ka.”
- Solar activity during the last 1000 yr inferred from radionuclide records (2007, background): “While there is no question that internally driven changes in geomagnetic dipole field intensity significantly influence cosmogenic radionuclide production rates on time scales longer than 2000–3000 yr (Wagner et al., 2000), it has also been proposed that geomagnetic field changes on centennial time ”