Pulsed Neural Networks
By Christopher Bishop. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrea Soltoggio
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Sebastian Risi
- Filip Ponulak
- Jeff Clune
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Jean-Baptiste Mouret
- Andrzej J. Kasinski
Citations in the corpus
- Born to Learn: the Inspiration, Progress, and Future of Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks (2017, background): “mputational relations among various nuclei, pathways, and learning processes (Krichmar, 2008; Vitay and Hamker, 2010; Schroll and Hamker, 2015). Finally, plasticity rules for spiking neural networks (Maass and Bishop, 2001) aim to demonstrate unique learning mechanisms that emerge from spiking dynam”
- Artificial neural networks in hardware: A survey of two decades of progress (2010, unknown): “Networks of I&F neurons exhibit a wide range of capabilities including feature binding, segmentation, pattern recognition, onset detection, and input prediction [131].”
- Rhythms of the brain (2006, background): “These ideas have their roots in early modeling attempts (Marr, 1971; Kohonen, 1984; Kaverna, 1988; Maas and Bishop, 1999).”
- Generalized integrate-and-fire models of neuronal activity approximate spike trains of a detailed model to a high degree of accuracy. (2004, methodology): “…spiking neuron models such as integrate-and-fire (IF) models (Geisler and Goldberg 1966; Hill 1936; Stein 1965; Tuckwell 1988) are highly popular and have been used to discuss aspects of neural coding, memory, or network dynamics (for a review, see Gerstner and Kistler 2002; Maass and Bishop 1998).”
- Neuronal Plasticity and Temporal Adaptivity: GasNet Robot Control Networks (2002, background): “…falls squarely into a larger class that is likely to contain other networks with temporally modifiable properties, such as continuous time recurrent networks (Beer & Gallagher, 1992), pulsed neural networks (Maass & Bishop, 1999), and networks with time-lagged synaptic activity (Harvey, 1993).”
- The evolvability of artificial neural net-works for robot control (2002, methodology): “” On this fundamental principle of temporal adaptivity, the GasNet neural network class falls squarely into a larger class that is likely to contain other networks with temporally modifiable properties, such as continuous time recurrent networks (Beer and Gallagher, 1992), pulsed neural networks (Ma”
- Supervised Learning in Spiking Neural Networks with ReSuMe: Sequence Learning, Classification, and Spike Shifting (2010, methodology): “In this context, hardware VLSI emulators of SNN become an interesting topic of investigation (we refer to Maass & Bishop, 1999, for an overview).”
- A Novel Approach for the Implementation of Large Scale Spiking Neural Networks on FPGA Hardware (2005, background): “Such research is motivated by the desire to form a more comprehensive understanding of information processing in biological networks and to investigate how this understanding could be used to improve traditional information processing techniques [2].”
- Evolving spiking neural network controllers for autonomous robots (2004, background): “Not only are implementations of SNNs difficult to hand craft [2] but the learning algorithms developed for SNNs are often restricted to very simple and application specific architectures [7].”
- From modulated Hebbian plasticity to simple behavior learning through noise and weight saturation (2012, background): “The reconfigure-and-saturate Hebbian dynamics hold equally with a simple spiking neuron model (Wilson, 1999; Maass and Bishop, 1999; Gerstner and Kistler, 2002b).”
- Stochastic Neural Computation I: Computational Elements (2001, methodology): “Part of the reason for this is that there are so many different ways of implementing pulsed neural networks in analog form [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].”