Normalised Australian insured losses from meteorological hazards : 1967-2006

By R. Crompton, J. McAneney. 2008

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A trend analysis of normalized insured damage from natural disasters (2012, background): “Fewer studies have analysed insured losses and all of them are confined to a specific hazard type in one country (Changnon and Changnon 1992; Changnon 2001, 2009a, b; Crompton and McAneney 2008).1 Yet, analyzing trends in insured losses is important for two reasons.”
Normalizing economic loss from natural disasters: a global analysis (2010, background): “…stocks (e.g., Pielke and Landsea 1998; Brooks and Doswell 2001; Vranes and Pielke 2009; Schmidt, Kemfert and Höppe 2009) or the value of dwellings (Crompton and McAneney 2008; Pielke et al. 2008), others, often for lack of data, simply GDP per capita (e.g., Raghavan and Rajseh 2003; Pielke et al.…”
Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change (2011, background): “For instance, the normalization study by Crompton and McAneney (2008) corrected over time for increasing resilience of buildings to high wind speeds.”