High-precision quark masses and QCD coupling from $n_f=4$ lattice QCD
By B. Chakraborty, C. Davies, B. Galloway, P. Knecht, J. Koponen, G. Donald, R. Dowdall, G. Peter Lepage, Craig McNeile. 2014
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present a new lattice QCD analysis of heavy-quark pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar correlators, using gluon configurations from the MILC Collaboration that include vacuum polarization from u , d , s , and c quarks ( n f = 4 ). We extract new values for the QCD coupling and for the c quark’s MS ¯ mass: α MS ¯ ( M Z , n f = 5 ) = 0.11822 ( 74 ) and m c ( 3 GeV , n f = 4 ) = 0.9851 ( 63 ) GeV . These agree well with our earlier simulations using n f = 3 sea quarks, vindicating the perturbative treatment of c quarks in that analysis. We also obtain a new nonperturbative result for the ratio of c and s quark masses: m c / m s = 11.652 ( 65 ) . This ratio implies m s ( 2 GeV , n f = 3 ) = 93.6 ( 8 ) MeV when it is combined with our new c mass. Combining m c / m s with our earlier m b / m c gives m b / m s = 52.55 ( 55 ) , which is several standard deviations (but only 4%) away from the Georgi-Jarlskop prediction from certain grand unified theories. Finally we obtain an n f = 4 estimate for m b / m c = 4.528 ( 54 ) which agrees well with our earlier n f = 3 result. The new ratio implies m b ( m b , n f = 5 ) = 4.162 ( 48 ) GeV .
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed5917f3c1bd403873047a7728101ef567acf6a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos (2019, background): “At the renormalization scale μ = 2 GeV, the Particle Data Group has recommended the following benchmark values for the current masses of u, d and s quarks [19, 293, 295, 296, 297, 298]:”