Effective density of Aquadag and fullerene soot black carbon reference materials used for SP2 calibration
By Martin Gysel, M. Laborde, J. Olfert, R. Subramanian, A. Gröhn. 2011
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract. The mass and effective density of black carbon (BC) particles generated from aqueous suspensions of Aquadag and fullerene soot was measured and parametrized as a function of their mobility diameter. The measurements were made by two independent research groups by operating a differential mobility analyser (DMA) in series with an aerosol particle mass analyser (APM) or a Couette centrifugal particle mass analyser (CPMA). Consistent and reproducible results were found in this study for different production lots of Aquadag, indicating that the effective density of these particles is a stable quantity and largely unaffected by differences in aerosol generation procedures and suspension treatments. The effective density of fullerene soot particles from one production lot was also found to be stable and independent of suspension treatments. Some differences to previous literature data were observed for both Aquadag and fullerene soot at larger particle diameters. Knowledge of the exact relationship between mobility diameter and particle mass is of great importance, as DMAs are commonly used to size-select particles from BC reference materials for calibration of single particle soot photometers (SP2), which quantitatively detect the BC mass in single particles.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed5530e13d56c91b54e33196195af9566d9da500
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- K. Naumann
- Martin Gysel
- M. Laborde
- Joshua P. Schwarz
- Harald Saathoff
- O. Möhler
- M. Schnaiter
- C. Linke
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Citations in the corpus
- Single Particle Soot Photometer intercomparison at the AIDA chamber (2012, methodology): “13 are based on size-selected particles, and the corresponding particle mass was calculated from the mobility diameter using the effective density data reported in Gysel et al. (2011).”