Experimental Designs in Sociological Research.
By O. Kempthorne, F. Chapin. 1949
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Cynthia Rudin
- Sudeepa Roy
- Alexander Volfovsky
- Elizabeth A. Stuart
- Ben B. Hansen
- Kosuke Imai
- Peter C. Austin
- José R. Zubizarreta
Citations in the corpus
- FLAME: A Fast Large-scale Almost Matching Exactly Approach to Causal Inference (2017, background): “gned to treatment independently of their potential outcomes. A natural approach to observational studies is matching treated and control units such that underlying background covariates are balanced (Chapin, 1947; Greenwood, 1945). If we can match units exactly (or almost exactly) on raw covariate v”
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies (1973, unknown): “Usually matched samples are "individually" (Greenwood [1945]), "precision" (Chapin [1947]), or "pair" (Cochran [1953]) matched, subject by subject.”
- Full Matching in an Observational Study of Coaching for the SAT (2004, methodology): “Adjusting by matching or stratification for more than a few variables seemed hopeless: In one widely cited case, Chapin (1947) started with 671 treated subjects and 523 controls but found only 23 treated– control pairs matching exactly on six categorical covariates.”
- Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward (2010, methodology): “For example, Chapin (1947) finds that with initial pools of 671 treated and 523 controls there are only 23 pairs that match exactly on six categorical covariates.”