International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code) : adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005

679 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Growing coffee: Psilanthus (Rubiaceae) subsumed on the basis of molecular and morphological data; implications for the size, morphology, distribution and evolutionary history of Coffea (2011, background): “The earliest published name is Coffea (Linnaeus, 1753), which predates Psilanthus (1873a) and has priority according to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN; McNeill et al., 2006).”
The NCBI Taxonomy database (2011, background): “The taxonomy statistics page gives a summary of counts in the taxonomy database that can be customized in several ways—the default settings display counts only for species with formal names, but this page can be configured in many different ways (Figure 1) There are three main codes of nomenclature—”
Morphology and identity of some ecologically important small Nitzschia species (2013, methodology): “International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code).”
Notes on Early Land Plants Today (2012, methodology): “We are using the Vienna Code of Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill et al. 2006) and we adopt two new rules from the Melbourne Code that is effective from 1.”
What is a species in fungal plant pathogens? (2021, background): “To reduce the confusion arising from dual nomenclature, plant pathologists and mycologists generally agreed in 2005 not to assign names to newly discovered asexual morphs of fungi that were known in their sexual state (McNeill et al. 2006).”