European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy
By Tanja A. Börzel. 2010
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed21cd315d16a9e08ebb35c5e9391abfeecff71a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Political Science and International Relations
- D. Levi‐Faur
- T. Risse
- Margaret Woods
- Tanja A. Börzel
- W. Jacoby
- Rachel Epstein
- Stefan Becker
- M. Bauer
In Strategy and Management
- T. Risse
- D. Levi‐Faur
- C. Humphrey
- Margaret Woods
- Asad Kausar
- Tanja A. Börzel
- Fabrizio Gilardi
- W. Jacoby
Citations in the corpus
- Regulating Audit beyond the Crisis: A Critical Discussion of the EU Green Paper (2011, background): “Each member state is allowed to choose one Commissioner (but it is not their role to represent that country, but rather, the interests of the EU – although for a critique of EU governance arrangements, see Börzel, 2010).”
- Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: towards a Single European Regulatory Space (2011, background): “Two interesting hybrid organizations, a ‘networked agency’ and an ‘agencified network’, were identified, and the relations between the networks and the agencies are understood as important features of the European governance mix (Börzel 2010; Brown and Scott 2010; Christensen and Nielsen 2010).”
- From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction (2012, background): “…vary several factors that have been identified as crucial by Europeanisation research, such as the ‘shadow of hierarchy’ (in the case of member states, see e.g. Börzel 2010) or the ‘shadow of conditionality’ (in the case of accession candidates, see e.g. Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier 2005).”