An Illustrated Consensus on the Classification of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
By R. Hruban, K. Takaori, D. Klimstra, N. Adsay, J. Albores–Saavedra, A. Biankin, S. Biankin, C. Compton, N. Fukushima, T. Furukawa and 9 more. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2004
1,067 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed1652e62d60300365a308e57969eb273aba5bd1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Masao Tanaka
- T. Kamisawa
- Masao Tanaka
- R. Hruban
- C. F. Fernandez-Del Castillo
- S. Chari
- K. Takaori
- C. Fernández‐del Castillo
Citations in the corpus
- Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. (2017, background): “grade IPMNs of gastric type [191], it may be preferable to report that “no in-situ or invasive carcinoma is identified; intraductal/”
- International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. (2012, background): “Since low-grade PanINs can be indistinguishable from low-grade IPMNs [160], it may be preferable to report that “no in situ or invasive carcinoma is identified; intraductal/intraepithelial neoplasm of low/moderate grade, either PanIN or low-grade IPMN, is present”.”
- Classification of types of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a consensus study (2005, background): “At a meeting of international experts on pancreatic precursor lesions held at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from August 18 to 19, 2003, a basic definition of an IPMN that is employed in the current study (Table 1) was worked out, and it was agreed that a consensus classification of IPMN subtypes should”