Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and the reverse Shannon theorem

By Charles H. Bennett, Peter W. Shor, John A. Smolin, Ashish V. Thapliyal. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2001

705 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The entanglement-assisted classical capacity of a noisy quantum channel (C/sub E/) is the amount of information per channel use that can be sent over the channel in the limit of many uses of the channel, assuming that the sender and receiver have access to the resource of shared quantum entanglement, which may be used up by the communication protocol. We show that the capacity C/sub E/ is given by an expression parallel to that for the capacity of a purely classical channel: i.e., the maximum, over channel inputs /spl rho/, of the entropy of the channel input plus the entropy of the channel output minus their joint entropy, the latter being defined as the entropy of an entangled purification of /spl rho/ after half of it has passed through the channel. We calculate entanglement-assisted capacities for two interesting quantum channels, the qubit amplitude damping channel and the bosonic channel with amplification/attenuation and Gaussian noise. We discuss how many independent parameters are required to completely characterize the asymptotic behavior of a general quantum channel, alone or in the presence of ancillary resources such as prior entanglement. In the classical analog of entanglement-assisted communication - communication over a discrete memoryless channel (DMC) between parties who share prior random information - we show that one parameter is sufficient, i.e., that in the presence of prior shared random information, all DMCs of equal capacity can simulate one another with unit asymptotic efficiency.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed059570b3c107768b863e5b2ca473e912f061de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Renato Renner
  2. Andreas J. Winter
  3. Matthias Christandl
  4. Mario Berta
  5. Patrick M. Hayden
  6. Sándor Imre
  7. Laszlo Gyongyosi
  8. Hung Viet Nguyen

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Renato Renner
  2. Andreas J. Winter
  3. Matthias Christandl
  4. Mario Berta
  5. Patrick M. Hayden
  6. Sándor Imre
  7. Laszlo Gyongyosi
  8. Hung Viet Nguyen

Citations in the corpus