A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia

By R. Begum, C. Siwar, J. Pereira, A. Jaafar. 2006

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed0220f9a67d294c79dcf3836c69dbb50f0b3169

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. J. Hahladakis
2. J. Millward-Hopkins
3. E. Iacovidou
4. Paul T. Williams
5. P. Purnell
6. Andrew Brown
7. Oliver Zwirner
8. C. Velis

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. J. Hahladakis
2. J. Millward-Hopkins
3. E. Iacovidou
4. Paul T. Williams
5. P. Purnell
6. Andrew Brown
7. Oliver Zwirner
8. C. Velis

Citations in the corpus

• Metrics for optimising the multi-dimensional value of resources recovered from waste in a circular economy: A critical review (2017, methodology): “Frameworks, methods and tools commonly used to support decision-makers when evaluating SWM and/or RRfW processes and systems include, amongst others, the LCA, cost-benefit analysis (CBA) (Begum et al., 2006; Clift et al., 2000; da Cruz et al., 2014; Djukic et al., 2016; Varouchakis et al., 2016; Wan”
• Factors Influencing Construction Waste Generation in Building Construction: Thailand’s Perspective (2019, background): “[30] Uyasatean and Utwarujikulchai [31] Bergsdal et al.”