Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A random forest guided tour (2015, background): “Interestingly, Banerjee and McKeague (2007) refer to the study of Qian et al. (2003) on the effects of phosphorus pollution in the Everglades, which uses split points in a novel way.”
A new method for detecting and interpreting biodiversity and ecological community thresholds (2010, background): “…in the bootstrapped values of x that produce the greatest sum(z)) or sum(z+) values is used to estimate uncertainty associated with community change points, and quantiles (e.g., 0Æ05, 0Æ95) of these distributions serve as empirical confidence limits (e.g., Qian et al. 2003; Toms & Lesperance 2003).”
Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. (2009, background): “[21] is basically a rediscovery of the basic change-point problem presented a half a century earlier in Ref.”