A phase-field model for highly anisotropic interfacial energy

By J. Eggleston, G. McFadden, Peter W. Voorhees. 2001

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ecef4cfcf260fb9a7d3d44c8470075bda46458e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Junseok Kim
2. John S. Lowengrub
3. Kyungkeun Kang
4. Steven M. Wise

In Materials Chemistry

1. Junseok Kim
2. John S. Lowengrub
3. Marino Arroyo
4. Irene Arias
5. Kyungkeun Kang
6. Rui Huang
7. Ted Belytschko
8. Xiaofeng Yang

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Marino Arroyo
2. Daniel Millán
3. Junseok Kim
4. John S. Lowengrub
5. Kyungkeun Kang

Citations in the corpus

• Phase‐field modeling and simulation of fracture in brittle materials with strongly anisotropic surface energy (2015, background): “An expedite and homogenized approach to deal with strongly anisotropic surface energies is to convexify the surface energy [37], at the expense of missing interesting details of the geometric structure of the free-surface.”
• A new phase-field model for strongly anisotropic systems (2009, unknown): “In an alternative phase-field approach, Eggleston et al. (2001) and Eggleston & Voorhees (2002) dealt with the ill-posedness of the anisotropic problem by convexifying the energy.”
• An introduction to phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution (2008, unknown): “More functions for √ κ(−→n ) or √ κ(θ) have been proposed to simulate the growth of faceted crystals [131–133].”
• Conservative multigrid methods for Cahn-Hilliard fluids (2004, methodology): “Such a transition occurs over a layer of width 4 ffiffiffi 2 p during the later stages of phase-separation and the quartic free energy is used [4].”