Explaining trust in political institutions: Some illustrations from the Baltic states

By Kadri Lühiste. 2006

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward a More Comprehensive Use of Social Exchange Theory to Study Residents’ Attitudes to Tourism (2016, background): “Citizens’ trust in government institutions is commonly referred to as ‘institutional trust’, defined as “confidence that political institutions will not misuse power” (Luhiste, 2006, p. 478).”
Public trust in tourism institutions. (2012, background): “development (Luhiste, 2006).”
Perceived social impacts of tourism and quality-of-life: a new conceptual model (2020, background): “Residents’ institutional trust is important to consider in sustainable tourism development especially as it may lead to support for the tourism industry (L€uhiste, 2006; Newton, 2001) through other missing mechanisms which are yet to be studied.”
Impact of Trust on Local Residents’ Mega-Event Perceptions and Their Support (2017, background): “In a situation where there is no or little trust in the organizing committee, the host community may not exhibit much enthusiasm and support toward the event (Lühiste 2006).”
Residents’ Support for Tourism (2016, methodology): “TG was measured using scales derived from Luhiste (2006) and Shi (2001).”