Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion*

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization (2007, background): “I address her question ‘‘what conditions favor the diachronic development of shift constructions’’ (Michaelis 2004a: 8) from the perspective of grammaticalization, with particular reference to the development of partitive constructions like a bit of apple into degree modifier constructions like a…”
Construal and Perspectivization (2010, background): “…construction (be +V-ing) can be said to impose a particular profile on the interpretation of the clause, backgrounding any boundaries (beginning and endpoint) of the designated process, irrespective of the meaning of the verb (see also Michaelis 2004; Janssen and Boogaart, this volume, chapter 31).”
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “There is a parallel to be drawn here with aspectual coercion (Michaelis, 2004, 2005), which concerns how the temporal unfolding of the event described by a verb is altered in different uses.”