Is the New Public Management a Paradigm? Does it Matter?
By J. Gow, Carole Dufour. 2000
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec94d16afd68df822be9fcf07094c10b5209bb5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
In Political Science and International Relations
In Public Administration
Citations in the corpus
- Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments (2014, background): “However, the ‘cult’ of managerial reforms is not supported by empirical research (e.g., Dunleavy et al. 2005; Gow and Dufour 2000; Hood and Peters 2004).”
- Public management reform in Malaysia: Recent initiatives and experiences (2006, background): “Despite skepticisms in some quarters and debates and controversies surrounding it, the NPM has lately become so widespread that it is seen as a new paradigm that is replacing the classical bureaucratic paradigm of public management (see Gow and Dufour, 2000).”