Using data envelopment analysis to assess macroeconomic policy performance

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, methodology): “In this field, this model is mostly referred to as the classic ‘benefit-of-the-doubt’ approach (Cherchye 2001; Cherchye et al. 2004, 2007), originally introduced by Melyn and Moesen (1991) in a context of macroeconomic evaluation.”
Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting (2009, background): “Cherchye, 2001 ; Kleinknecht et al , 2002 and OECD, 2003 ).”
Tools for Composite Indicators Building (2005, unknown): “Rank in [10-15]”
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide (2008, unknown): “, 2004); Macro-economic performance evaluation (Melyn & Moesen, 1991; Cherchye 2001); Unemployment (Storrie & Bjurek, 1999; 2000).”
Constructing Consistent Composite Indicators: the Issue of Weights (2005, background): “A general objective of most of these indicators is the ranking of countries and their benchmarking according to some aggregated dimensions (see e.g. Cherchye, 2001, K leinknecht 2002 and OECD, 2003).”