A tale of two paradigms: the mutual incommensurability of ΛCDM and MOND

By S. McGaugh. 2014

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The concordance model of cosmology, ΛCDM, provides a satisfactory description of the evolution of the universe and the growth of large-scale structure. Despite considerable effort, this model does not at present provide a satisfactory description of small-scale structure and the dynamics of bound objects like individual galaxies. In contrast, MOND provides a unique and predictively successful description of galaxy dynamics, but is mute on the subject of cosmology. Here I briefly review these contradictory world views, emphasizing the wealth of distinct interlocking lines of evidence that went into the development of ΛCDM while highlighting the practical impossibility that it can provide a satisfactory explanation of the observed MOND phenomenology in galaxy dynamics. I also briefly review the baryon budget in groups and clusters of galaxies where neither paradigm provides an entirely satisfactory description of the data. Relatively little effort has been devoted to the formation of structure in MOND; I re...

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec7d344cc3bc43930ea7f442f136b0eb013531c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Pavel Kroupa
  2. S. McGaugh
  3. James S. Bullock
  4. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. M. Pawlowski
  7. F. Lelli
  8. J. Schombert

In Instrumentation

  1. James S. Bullock
  2. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  3. Pavel Kroupa
  4. F. Lelli
  5. S. McGaugh
  6. J. Schombert
  7. M. Pawlowski
  8. P. Hopkins

Citations in the corpus