Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Antonymy and negation (2006, background): “In addition to the conceptual realm, there is an operating system consisting of different types of construals , which are imposed on the domains by speakers and addressees at the time of use (Paradis, 2004, 2005a).”
Polysemy and word meaning: an account of lexical meaning for different kinds of content words (2018, background): “…structures are thought to provide ‘aspects’ or ‘facets’ (that is, different ways of seeing a given entity)2, which are also the senses that enter into truth-conditional compositions (Cruse, 2004; Frisson, 2009; Paradis, 2004), an idea reminiscent of Langacker’s (1984) notion of ‘active zones.’”
Configurations, construals and change: expressions of DEGREE1 (2008, unknown): “They are not themselves conceptual, but ways of structuring conceptual domains, reﬂecting some broad basic cognitive abilities, such as the choice of Gestalt , the focusing of attention, categorization and the selection of speaker perspective (Croft & Wood 2000; Paradis 2004, 2005).”
Describing Sensory Experience: The Genre of Wine Reviews (2013, unknown): “…of meaning, the entity evoked is ‘cherry’, the configuration is one of WHOLE FOR PART and the mechanism is focus of attention on a salient part of the meaning structure, more precisely zone activation within a sense (for extended discussion of metonymization, see Paradis 2004/2011, 2010, 2011).”