Assessing Bat Detectability and Occupancy with Multiple Automated Echolocation Detectors

By P. M. Gorresen, Adam C. Miles, C. Todd, F. Bonaccorso, Theodore J. Weller. 2008

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tree microhabitats as indicators of bird and bat communities in Mediterranean forests (2013, background): “For the following analyses, bird abundance was defined as the umber of individuals per species and bat abundance was defined s the number of echolocation calls per species, given that it was ot possible to quantify the number of individuals (Barataud, 2012; orresen et al., 2008).”
Accounting for detectability improves estimates of species richness in tropical bat surveys (2011, background): “Studies estimating probabilities of detection for bats are scarce and focused either on one or a few species in the context of acoustic monitoring surveys (Duchamp et al. 2006; Gorresen et al. 2008).”
Sampling period, size and duration influence measures of bat species richness from acoustic surveys (2012, background): “Acoustic survey effort influences the likelihood that various species are detected during survey events (Gorresen et al. 2008; Weller 2008).”
Shifts in bat community structure related to evolved traits and features of human-altered landscapes (2008, background): “Gorresen et al. (2008) found that the number of locations sampled is more important for acoustically estimating bat species occupancy when compared to repeated visits.”