Residual Networks are Exponential Ensembles of Relatively Shallow Networks

By Andreas Veit, Michael J. Wilber, Serge J. Belongie. 2016

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this work, we introduce a novel interpretation of residual networks showing they are exponential ensembles. This observation is supported by a large-scale lesion study that demonstrates they behave just like ensembles at test time. Subsequently, we perform an analysis showing these ensembles mostly consist of networks that are each relatively shallow. For example, contrary to our expectations, most of the gradient in a residual network with 110 layers comes from an ensemble of very short networks, i.e., only 10-34 layers deep. This suggests that in addition to describing neural networks in terms of width and depth, there is a third dimension: multiplicity, the size of the implicit ensemble. Ultimately, residual networks do not resolve the vanishing gradient problem by preserving gradient flow throughout the entire depth of the network - rather, they avoid the problem simply by ensembling many short networks together. This insight reveals that depth is still an open research question and invites the exploration of the related notion of multiplicity.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Model Architectures, Scaling & Learning Theory

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Dacheng Tao
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Richard Socher
  5. Caiming Xiong
  6. Quoc V. Le
  7. Jianfeng Gao
  8. Percy Liang

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Dacheng Tao
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Xiaogang Wang
  4. Alan L. Yuille
  5. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Chen Change Loy
  8. Yi Yang

In Model Architectures

  1. Richard Socher
  2. Caiming Xiong
  3. Yoshua Bengio
  4. Kevin Gimpel
  5. Quoc V. Le
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Dan Hendrycks
  8. Anton van den Hengel

In Scaling & Learning Theory

  1. Nicolas Ballas
  2. Richard Socher
  3. Dan Hendrycks
  4. Caiming Xiong
  5. Lin F. Yang
  6. Guillermo Sapiro
  7. Yoshua Bengio
  8. Junmo Kim

Citations in the corpus