The local discontinuous Galerkin method for contaminant transport
By V. Aizinger, Clint N. Dawson, Bernardo Cockburn, Paul E. Castillo. 2000
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec5ccea6835b732759212180f18549c55e546a05
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Chi-Wang Shu
- Yan Xu
- Shuyu Sun
- Bernardo Cockburn
- Clint N. Dawson
- Mary F. Wheeler
- Peter Bastian
- A. Seidel‐Morgenstern
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Shuyu Sun
- Bernardo Cockburn
- Peter Bastian
- Chi-Wang Shu
- A. Seidel‐Morgenstern
- Shamsul Qamar
- Waqas Ashraf
- Shumaila Javeed
Citations in the corpus
- Higher Order Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Flow and Transport in Porous Media (2003, methodology): “Advantages of DG methods are their higher order convergence property, local conservation of mass and exibilit y with respect to meshing and hpadaptive renemen t. Their uniform applicability to hyperbolic, elliptic and parabolic problems as well as their robustness with respect to strongly discontinu”
- Local Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for High-Order Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equations (2009, methodology): “LDG methods have been generalized to transport equations [4,47], three-dimensional shallow water flow [3] and Richards’ equation [69, 70].”
- Discontinuous Galerkin methods for coupled flow and reactive transport problems (2005, background): “of flow d oupling the unily, the r in order ces for flow and t; ecently cal dif- Primal discontinuous Galerkin methods with interior penalty are proposed to solve the coupled system and reactive transport in porous media, which arises from many applications includingmiscible displacement an…”
- Analysis and numerical investigation of two dynamic models for liquid chromatography (2013, methodology): “Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods have been widely used in the computational fluid dynamics and could be a good choice to solve non-linear convection-dominated problems, see e.g. Bassi and Rebay (1997), Bahhar et al. (1998), Aizinger et al. (2000), Holik (2009).”
- A hybrid mixed discontinuous Galerkin finite-element method for convection–diffusion problems (2010, background): “All rights reserved List of AICES technical reports: http://www.aices.rwth-aachen.de/preprints”
- Approximation of the Velocity by Coupling Discontinuous Galerkin and Mixed Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems (2002, methodology): “See [ 1 ,18,21] for applications to convection–diffusion problems, [16,22] for applications to purely elliptic problems, [23] for applications to the Stokes system; a comparison of the performance of several DG methods, including the LDG, applied to a model elliptic problem has been recently carried”
- Discontinuous Galerkin methods for reactive transport in porous media (2003, background): “We remark that the strong assumption of reaction rate being Lipschitz continuous function of concentration as in [6, 72] has limited usage in practice because, for example, any reaction of order greater than 1 is not Lipschitz continuous, but is locally Lipschitz continuous.”