Better the devil you know than a world you don't? Intolerance of uncertainty and worldview explanations for belief in conspiracy theories
By R. Moulding, Simon Nix-Carnell, Alexandra Schnabel, M. Nedeljkovic, E. E. Burnside, A. Lentini, Nazia Mehzabin. 2016
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Conspiracy Theory (CT) endorsers believe in an omnipresent, malevolent, and highly coordinated group that wields secret influence for personal gain, and credit this group with the responsibility for many noteworthy events. Two explanations for the emergence of CTs are that they result from social marginalisation and a lack of agency, or that they are due to a need-to-explain-the-unexplained. Furthermore, representativeness heuristics may form reasoning biases that make such beliefs more likely. Two related studies (N = 107; N = 120) examined the relationships between these social marginalisation, intolerance of uncertainty, heuristics and CT belief using a correlational design. Overall, intolerance of uncertainty did not link strongly to CT belief, but worldview variables did — particularly a sense of the world as (socially) threatening, non-random, and with no fixed morality. The use of both representative heuristics that were examined was heightened in those participants more likely to endorse CTs. These factors seem to contribute to the likelihood of whether the individual will endorse CTs generally, relating similarly to common CTs, CTs generally historically accepted as “true”, and to the endorsement of fictional CTs that the individual would find novel. Implications are discussed.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec3c1420d8eb9bd02210acb14575cf4c2d36a0c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Health
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories (2020, background): “For example, some studies have not found any association between BCT and cognitive closure (Imhoff & Bruder, 2014; Leman & Cinnirella, 2013) or need for certainty (Moulding et al., 2016).”