Website fingerprinting: attacking popular privacy enhancing technologies with the multinomial naïve-bayes classifier
By Dominik Herrmann, Rolf Wendolsky, Hannes Federrath. 2009
492 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ian Goldberg
- George Danezis
- Yang Zhang
- Jamie Hayes
- Tao Wang
- Neil Zhenqiang Gong
- Michael Backes
- Jinyuan Jia
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Ian Goldberg
- Tao Wang
- George Danezis
- Jamie Hayes
- Jinyuan Jia
- Neil Zhenqiang Gong
- Marc Juárez
- Yang Zhang
In Signal Processing
- Ian Goldberg
- Tao Wang
- Domenico Ciuonzo
- Antonio Montieri
- Giuseppe Aceto
- Antonio Pescapè
- George Danezis
- Jamie Hayes
Citations in the corpus
- A Critical Evaluation of Website Fingerprinting Attacks (2014, unknown): “Website fingerprinting; Tor; privacy”
- MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examples (2019, background): “nd adversarial examples. Other than membership inference attacks, many other attacks rely on machine learning classifiers, e.g.,attribute inference attacks [11, 17, 28], website fingerprinting attacks[7, 22, 29, 46, 67], side-channel attacks [73], location attacks [5, 45, 52, 72], and author identif”
- Circuit Fingerprinting Attacks: Passive Deanonymization of Tor Hidden Services (2015, methodology): “[20] were the first to test this attack against Tor using a multinomial Naive Bayes classifier, which only achieved 3% success rate since it relied on packet sizes which are fixed in Tor.”
- Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep Learning (2018, background): “The closed-world assumption was criticized for being unrealistic [13, 24, 15], as the world of sites that can be potentially visited is so large that not even the most powerful adversaries have the resources to collect data”
- Improved website fingerprinting on Tor (2013, methodology): “[6] in 2009 described an improved method that gave a higher accuracy than Liberatore and Levine under comparable conditions.”
- Website Fingerprinting at Internet Scale (2016, methodology): “[11] were the first to apply website fingerprinting to the anonymization networks JAP [2] and Tor [8] as well as on OpenSSH, OpenVPN, Stunnel, and Cisco IPsec-VPN.”
- Mobile Encrypted Traffic Classification Using Deep Learning: Experimental Evaluation, Lessons Learned, and Challenges (2019, methodology): “[31] and [32] are also employed by Alan and Kaur [30] to check out whether Android apps can be identified from their launch-time traffic using only TCP/IP header information.”
- Website fingerprinting in onion routing based anonymization networks (2011, methodology): “[11] in order to compare our results to previous best achieved results.”
- k-fingerprinting: A Robust Scalable Website Fingerprinting Technique (2015, methodology): “As a result, many works have shown that website fingerprinting attacks are possible even when a client is browsing with encryption or using an anonymity tool such as Tor [7, 16, 17, 21, 23, 27, 32, 36, 38, 39].”
- Touching from a distance: website fingerprinting attacks and defenses (2012, methodology): “, proposed a fingerprinting attack based on a Multinomial Naive-Bayes classifier [10], which, in our experiments is able to identify which web page a victim visited (out of a set of 100 possible pages) with a success rate of less than 5%.”
- A Systematic Approach to Developing and Evaluating Website Fingerprinting Defenses (2014, background): “Therefore, the poor performance of most early WF attacks [6, 9, 10] may be attributed to the fact that they explicitly discard packet length frequencies.”
- Robust Smartphone App Identification via Encrypted Network Traffic Analysis (2017, methodology): “Subsequently, Herman et al. [17] outperformed Liberatore et al. by presenting a method that relies on common text mining techniques to the normalized frequency distribution of observable IP packet sizes.”