The importance of defining periods of complete mortality reporting for research using automated data from primary care

By A. Maguire, B. Blak, M. Thompson. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec0e7d268f8788f0a3a8e5e0d53ca865603b6912

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Bates
2. John B. Young
3. A. Clegg
4. Ronan Ryan
5. L. Nichols
6. Elizabeth Ann Teale
7. Mohammed A. Mohammed
8. J. Parry

Citations in the corpus

• Do men consult less than women? An analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data (2013, unknown): “Second, practices’ reporting on mortality rates must be consistent with their patients’ demographic profile.(34) Patients within eligible practices entered the study on”
• Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data (2016, methodology): “All-cause mortality was identified by date of death, which is reliably recorded in the electronic health record; practices were included after the date of acceptable mortality recording [19].”