One-loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections
By Ansgar Denner, Stefano Pozzorini. 2000
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract. We present results for the complete one-loop electroweak logarithmic corrections for general processes at high energies and fixed angles. Our results are applicable to arbitrary matrix elements that are not mass suppressed. We give explicit results for 4-fermion processes and gauge-boson pair production in $e^+e^-$ annihilation.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec0557a0141dabec735312e687ec048469811f1c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atlas Collaboration
- Cms Collaboration
- Gudrun Heinrich
- M. Schönherr
- Ansgar Denner
- Stefan Dittmaier
- F. Krauss
- Stefan Kallweit
Citations in the corpus
- Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report (2016, methodology): “[308, 309] has been implemented in the Alpgen v2.”
- Event generation with Sherpa 2.2 (2019, methodology): “They will include the description of higher-orders in the perturbative parts of the simulation, for example incorporating advances in the resummation properties of parton showers [21, 20, 114], the inclusion of approximate high-energy EW effects as based on [196], a fully massive five-flavour scheme”
- Les Houches 2013: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report (2014, methodology): “[131,322], DL corrections can be accounted for by factorizing a proper correction which depends on flavour and kinematics of all possible pairs of electroweak charged external legs.”
- NLO electroweak automation and precise predictions for W + multijet production at the LHC (2014, methodology): “The importance of EW Sudakov logarithms for the Z+ multijet background to Supersymmetry searches has been estimated in [36], using the next-to-leading logarithmic approximation of [28].”