Statistical implications of selectively reported inferential results

50 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Skew‐normal Distribution and Related Multivariate Families * (2005, methodology): “Recently, similar results have been reobtained independently by Loperfido (2002).”
A unified view on skewed distributions arising from selections (2006, background): “The distribution of the maximum of those two random variables is exactly skew-normal (Roberts 1966; Loperfido 2002) with skewness depending onρ.”
Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t‐distribution (2003, background): “A result that is similar to proposition 2 for the case when f is an elliptical distribution has been given by Genton and Loperfido (2002).”
Generalized skew-Cauchy distribution ☆ (2007, unknown): “2Þ is BVNð0; 0; 1; 1; 0Þ distributed, namely X 1 and X 2 are independent Nð0; 1Þ distributed, then Proposition 1 implies X ð1Þ and X ð2Þ are SNð 1Þ and SNð1Þ distributed, respectively, which coincides with the result by Loperfido (2002).”
A Generalization of the Skew-Normal Distribution: The Beta Skew-Normal (2011, background): “Sharafi and Behboodian (2008) have shown that for λ = 1, (2) is the density function of the (n + 1)−th order statistic X(n+1) in a sample of size n+1 from N(0, 1).”
On the exact distribution of the maximum of absolutely continuous dependent random variables (2008, unknown): “This result has originally been given by Roberts (1966) and recently rediscovered by Loperfido (2002).”