Earnings Functions, Rates of Return and Treatment Effects: The Mincer Equation and Beyond

By James J. Heckman, Lance Lochner, Petra E. Todd. Social Science Research Network, 2005

1,026 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper considers the interpretation of "Mincer rates of return." We test and reject the Mincer model. It fails to track the time series of true returns. We show how repeated cross section and panel data improves the ability of analysts to estimate the ex ante and ex post marginal rate of returns. Accounting for sequential revelation of information calls into question the validity of the internal rate of return as a tool for policy analysis. The large estimated psychic costs of schooling found in recent work helps to explain why persons do not attend school even though the financial rewards for doing so are high. We present methods for computing distributions of ex post and ex ante returns.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebdd946181b5650d91c1e1b426ba6de1f7a9f981

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Flávio Cunha
  2. Lance Lochner
  3. Eric A. Hanushek
  4. Robert E. Lucas
  5. Miriam Gensowski
  6. James J. Heckman
  7. Ludger Woessmann
  8. Kevin M. Stange

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Eric A. Hanushek
  2. Ludger Woessmann
  3. James J. Heckman
  4. Flávio Cunha
  5. Lance Lochner
  6. Steven G. Rivkin
  7. Miriam Gensowski
  8. Andrés Santos

Citations in the corpus