How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells.

By Robert Shapley, J. Victor. 1981

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Functional mechanisms shaping lateral geniculate responses to artificial and natural stimuli. (2008, methodology): “Similarly, contrast gain control depends on the root-meansquare contrast falling over a region centered over the RF (Shapley and Victor, 1979, 1981), which we term suppressive field (Bonin et al., 2005, 2006).”
The Statistical Computation Underlying Contrast Gain Control (2006, unknown): “It is commonly thought to be the root-meansquare contrast, the local standard deviation of intensities relative to the mean intensity (Shapley and Victor, 1978, 1981; Bonin et al., 2005).”
Population coding under normalization (2009, background): “…decade has shown that such normalization is a widespread computation in the brain; it can be found in the retina (Benardete, Kaplan, & Knight, 1992; Shapley & Victor, 1979a, 1979b, 1981; Solomon, Lee, & Sun, 2006), the lateral geniculate nucleus (Bonin, Mante, & Carandini, 2005, 2006), primary…”
The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (2005, methodology): “This assessment of the selectivity of the suppressive field for temporal frequency complements previous studies of gain control in retina and LGN (Shapley and Victor, 1978, 1981; Benardete and Kaplan, 1999).”
The challenges natural images pose for visual adaptation. (2009, unknown): “Second, many aspects of behavior depend on responses from multiple ganglion cell types that likely differ in their adaptational properties (Shapley and Victor, 1981; Smirnakis et al., 1997; Chander and Chichilnisky, 2001).”
Suppression without inhibition in visual cortex. (2002, background): “Saturation and suppression might be manifestations of (B) Responses of the same cell to the 4 Hz test in the presence of retinal contrast gain control ( Shapley and Victor, 1981; masks of different drift rate (experiment 24.10).”
The Normalization Model of Attention (2009, result): “…responses is analogous to earlier models of retinal light adaptation (Sperling and Sondhi, 1968) and to models of contrast gain control in the retina and LGN (Baccus and Meister, 2002; Bonin et al., 2005; Kaplan et al., 1987; Mante et al., 2005; Shapley and Victor, 1978; Shapley and Victor, 1981).”
Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? (2005, background): “, 1990) and of contrast gain control (Shapley and Victor, 1981; Victor, 1987; Carandini et al., 1997; Benardete and Kaplan, 1999) on the temporal weighting function of neurons in the early visual system.”