Direct and indirect effects in herbivore - periphyton interactions

By A. Liess, H. Hillebrand. 2004

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebc2da92abda36c6cb3401776194ad26996c4bfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. A. Liess
2. C. Townsend
3. C. Matthaei
4. K. Lange
5. J. Piggott
6. R. McDowall

In Environmental Chemistry

1. A. Liess
2. C. Townsend
3. C. Matthaei
4. K. Lange
5. J. Piggott

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Liess
2. C. Townsend
3. C. Matthaei
4. K. Lange
5. R. McDowall

Citations in the corpus

• Light, nutrients and grazing interact to determine diatom species richness via changes to productivity, nutrient state and grazer activity (2009, background): “…algal biomass in our experiment, possibly because indirect positive effects of grazers on algal productivity compensated for the ingested algal biomass (Liess & Hillebrand 2004) or because space was cleared for colonization by other species that were not preferred food species (Begon et al. 2006).”