OGC Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture
By M. Botts, G. Percivall, C. Reed, J. Davidson. GeoSensor Networks, 2008
929 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geography, Planning and Development
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebbf4e7f4b58f6250eba2ab087368cdb6eaa9930
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- José M. Hernández-Muñoz
- L. Muñoz
- Arne Bröring
- Mirko A. Presser
- Pramod Anantharam
- Christoph Stasch
- Luis A. Hernández Gómez
- J. Pettersson
Citations in the corpus
- Semantic Gateway as a Service Architecture for IoT Interoperability (2014, background): “• OGC Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) The SWE efforts established by the Open Geospatial Consortium include following important specifications: Observation & Measurement (O&M), Sensor Model Language (SensorML) and Sensor Observation Service (SOS)[13].”
- Wireless sensor network virtualization: A survey (2015, neutral): “In our review of WSN virtualization area we strongly felt the need for harmonization between different protocols, data formats, encoding schemes, and consortium-led efforts such as Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) [97].”
- New Generation Sensor Web Enablement (2011, methodology): “This work builds upon but is different from [3,8,16].”
- Smart Cities at the Forefront of the Future Internet (2011, positive): “This has been reflected by a set of standards used in the platform (SensorML, Observation & Measurements, Sensor Observation Service, Sensor Planning Service, Sensor Alert Service and Web Notification Service [26]).”