Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.
By H. Wiedemann, A. Wheeler, Gordon R. Bernard, B. Thompson, Douglas Hayden, B. deBoisblanc, A. Connors, R. D. Hite, A. Harabin. New England Journal of Medicine, 2006
3,072 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eba87f29b395f03b88a392a266d99a8a0d26a9e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sean M. Bagshaw
- John A. Kellum
- Claudio Ronco
- Mervyn Singer
- R. Ferrer
- R. Wald
- Djillali Annane
- J. Boyd
Citations in the corpus
- Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research. (2008, unknown): “Lower, median (IQR) 22 (22, 28) 23 (18, 26) 0.”
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 (2017, background): “A fluid-conservative strategy to minimize fluid infusion and weight gain in patients with ARDS, based on either a CVP or a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter (PA wedge pressure) measurement, along with clinical variables to guide treatment, led to fewer days of mechanical ventilation and reduced ICU LOS”
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Treatment (2011, background): “To make a diagnosis of ALI or ARDS, the presence of left atrial hypertension should be excluded on the basis of clinical findings, although one clinical trial (9) established that the pulmonary arterial wedge pressure is greater than 18 mm Hg in 29% of patients with ALI/ARDS.”