Error Rate Bounds in Crowdsourcing Models
By Hongwei Li, Bin Yu, Dengyong Zhou. 2013
25 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Crowdsourcing is an effective tool for human-powered computation on many tasks challenging for computers. In this paper, we provide finite-sample exponential bounds on the error rate (in probability and in expectation) of hyperplane binary labeling rules under the Dawid-Skene crowdsourcing model. The bounds can be applied to analyze many common prediction methods, including the majority voting and weighted majority voting. These bound results could be useful for controlling the error rate and designing better algorithms. We show that the oracle Maximum A Posterior (MAP) rule approximately optimizes our upper bound on the mean error rate for any hyperplane binary labeling rule, and propose a simple data-driven weighted majority voting (WMV) rule (called one-step WMV) that attempts to approximate the oracle MAP and has a provable theoretical guarantee on the error rate. Moreover, we use simulated and real data to demonstrate that the data-driven EM-MAP rule is a good approximation to the oracle MAP rule, and to demonstrate that the mean error rate of the data-driven EM-MAP rule is also bounded by the mean error rate bound of the oracle MAP rule with estimated parameters plugging into the bound.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Science Applications
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: A Big Data - AI Integration Perspective (2018, background): “g functions, there is not enough correlated labeling functions to train the generative model accurately. On the other hand, if there are more than about 100 labeling functions, a theoretical analysis [117] shows that taking a majority vote produces arbitrarily accurate labels and is sufficient for ou”
- Crowdsourcing large scale wrapper inference (2014, unknown): “instance, in [26].”