Mediating International Crises
By Jonathan Wilkenfeld, K. Young, Victor Asal, David Quinn. 2003
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb9d960ae19e55ec96c584de81bab05e6ce5fd33
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Govinda Clayton
- P. Wallensteen
- K. Beardsley
- Isak Svensson
- Jacob Bercovitch
- Scott Sigmund Gartner
- Karl Derouen
- J. Greig
Citations in the corpus
- Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems (2008, unknown): “19See Quinn et al. (2006).”
- Talking peace (2014, background): “In addition, Wilkenfeld et al. (2005) and Beardsley et al. (2006) point to long-term consequences, not just the immediate ending of war, when assessing mediation.”
- Stepping Into the Fray: When Do Mediators Mediate? (2005, background): “Wilkenfeld et al. (2003) find that crises between contiguous states are more likely to be mediated than those between noncontiguous states. The divisibility of territorial issues may also make disputes between contiguous states more open to mediation. Bercovitch, Anagnoson, and Wille’s (1991), for e”
- Introducing the Civil Wars Mediation (CWM) dataset (2011, background): “We conclude that the CWM data open new avenues for the study of mediation in civil wars.”
- Relative rebel strength and the onset and outcome of civil war mediation (2013, background): “The incentives that each actor may have to later renege on any agreement can, in the same way as they can lead to the onset of conflict, also prevent the resolution of war (Beardsley et al., 2006; Wilkenfeld et al., 2005).”
- Is There Method in the Madness of Mediation? Some Lessons for Mediators from Quantitative Studies of Mediation (2006, background): “Further analyses of mediation revealed that while communication-facilitation strategies are the most frequently utilized by international mediators, directive strategies appear to be the most successful (eg, Bercovitch and Houston, 1996 ; Gartner and Bercovitch, 2006 ; Wilkenfeld et al, 2003 ).”
- Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes (2006, background): “Mediation by any style should increase the chance that a formal agreement will be reached (Wilkenfeld et al. 2003).”