Three-dimensional phase field model of proper martensitic transformation

By A. Artemev, Yongmei M. Jin, A. Khachaturyan. 2001

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The phase field technique for modeling multiphase materials (2008, methodology): “The phase field method has also been applied to investigate proper and improper martensitic transformations in single and polycrystals [326–331], cubic-to-tetragonal transformations [332–334], hexagonalto-orthorhombic transformations [335–338], ferroelectric transformations [339, 340], phase transfo”
An introduction to phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution (2008, methodology): “For martensitic transformations [27,28,119] and other structural transformations [35,79], the effect of the coherency stresses on the shape and spatial distribution of the different orientation variants were analyzed, as well as the influence of externally applied stresses on the structure.”
Interface Propagation and Microstructure Evolution in Phase Field Models of Stress-Induced Martensitic Phase Transformations (2010, methodology): “Some theories of martensitic phase transfor- mations employ order parameters related to transformation strains (Artemev et al., 2001; Levitas and Preston, 2002a,b; Lev- itas et al., 2003; Levitas and Lee, 2007; Seol et al., 2003; Shenoy et al., 1999; Wang and Khachaturyan, 1997; Wang et al., 2001),…”