Phylogeny of the Neuropterida: a first molecular approach

By E. Haring, U. Aspöck. 2004

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb97a1a9a7a3ad4739658c3d2371a61adf960c6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

On wings of lace: phylogeny and Bayesian divergence time estimates of Neuropterida (Insecta) based on morphological and molecular data (2010, methodology): “It appears, based on molecular data (presented herein and by Haring & Aspöck (2004)) and various morphological characteristics (e.g. Sziráki, 1996), that this anomalous family is not closely related to Mantispidae and Berothidae as was proposed previously.”
A mitochondrial genome phylogeny of the Neuropterida (lace‐wings, alderflies and snakeflies) and their relationship to the other holometabolous insect orders (2009, methodology): “Haring & Aspöck (2004) using 18S, elongation factor-1a, and the mitochondrial cox3 gene find strong support for Megaloptera + Neuroptera in accordance with an earlier morphological analysis (Aspöck et al. 2001).”
Evolution of lacewings and allied orders using anchored phylogenomics (Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera) (2018, background): “Dilaridae and Hemerobiidae were placed as subsequent sequential clades, subtending a larger dichotomy between one clade comprising Mantispidae, Rhachiberothidae and Berothidae, and the other including the remaining families of Neuroptera.”
Endopterygote systematics – where do we stand and what is the goal (Hexapoda, Arthropoda)? (2006, background): “A recent molecular study (16S rRNA, 18S rRNA, elongation factor 1-a, cytochrome c oxidase 3) by Haring & Aspöck (2004) largely confirms the results of the morphology-based analyses (Aspöck et al., 2001; Aspöck, 2002a).”
Owlflies are derived antlions: anchored phylogenomics supports a new phylogeny and classification of Myrmeleontidae (Neuroptera) (2018, background): “…molecular data have further confirmed the monophyly of the superfamily within the Neuroptera (Aspöck et al., 2001; Aspöck, 2002; Winterton, 2003; Haring & Aspöck, 2004; Aspöck & Aspöck, 2008; Beutel et al., 2010; Winterton et al., 2010; Jones, 2014; Michel et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017;…”
FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE (2016, methodology): “Monophyly is supported by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal and mitochondrial genes (Haring and Aspöck, 2004), housekeeping genes (Wiegmann et al.”
Phylogeny of Myrmeleontiformia based on larval morphology (Neuropterida: Neuroptera) (2017, methodology): “The next year Haring & Aspöck (2004) published a neighbour-joining tree based on amino acid sequences of COIII that reconstructed a monophyletic Myrmeleontiformia (see Fig.”