Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review

By Z. Su, Lin-li Ye, Ye Lu. 2006

1,635 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb87fbd4b5e164001993e822960f6fd846a059a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

A Lamb-wave-based technique for damage detection in composite laminates (2009, background): “…in detecting fatigue cracks in metallic structures, disbonds and delaminations in composite structures and for the assessment of structural repairs, e.g. (Boller 2000, Diamanti et al 2004, Su et al 2006, Raghavan and Cesnik 2007, Diamanti et al 2007, Worden et al 2007, Ihn and Chang 2008).”
Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: A state-of-the-art review (2020, background): “The potential types of damage that guided Lamb wave-based NDT can provide are summarised by Rose;(77) the mode selection, generation and collection, modelling and simulation, signal processing and interpretation have been well documented by Su et al.(84) A later review on guided waves for damage ide”
Structural Health Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey (2017, background): “In [49], Lamb-wave-based damage identification approaches for composite structures is presented.”
Detection of thermal fatigue in composites by second harmonic Lamb waves (2012, methodology): “The advantages of the ultrasonic Lamb wave method have promoted the application of this technique to composite materials [4].”
Multi-damage localization on large complex structures through an extended delay-and-sum based method (2016, background): “Relevant approaches are mainly classified into three categories: time-series analysis, frequency analysis, and integrated time–frequency analysis.(17) The fourth element is the appropriate damage identification algorithm to determine the status of the monitoring structure.”
Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review (2016, methodology): “Several comprehensive reviews [19, 20] already exist in literature, however, those are mostly dated in the last decade.”
Successes and challenges in non-destructive testing of aircraft composite structures (2020, background): “Very good reviews of current Lamb wave based scanning techniques in aerospace industry can be found in.(49,55) For the remainder of this paper, focus will be on NDT methods rather than SHM systems.”
Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Applications (2019, background): “Comprehensive reviews on the state of the art of Lamb wave-based damage identification approaches can be found in literatures [35,36].”
Simulation Methods for Guided Wave-Based Structural Health Monitoring: A Review (2015, background): “[241, 242], Raghavan and Cesnik [207] and the Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring edited by Boller et al.”
Understanding a time reversal process in Lamb wave propagation (2009, background): “The advances in sensor and hardware technologies for efficient generation and detection of Lambwaves and the increased usage of solid composites in loadcarrying structures have led to an explosion of studies that use Lambwaves for detecting defects in composite structures [16–24].”
Complete noncontact laser ultrasonic imaging for automated crack visualization in a plate (2013, background): “In particular, ultrasonic based SHM techniques are garnering attention because ultrasonic waves are sensitive to even small defects and can travel a relatively long distance with little attenuation [1–6].”
A review of non-destructive techniques used for mechanical damage assessment in polymer composites (2018, background): “Commonly, antisymmetric fundamental mode is well adapted to detect delamination and transverse cracks in glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy materials [3].”
A multiscale flaw detection algorithm based on XFEM (2014, background): “image-processing tools [7] are also limited in that they sometimes are unable to provide accurate information on the location, size, and shape of damage.”