A TEST OF MUTUAL AID IN COMMON MYCORRHIZAL NETWORKS: ESTABLISHED VEGETATION NEGATES BENEFIT IN SEEDLINGS

By M. Kytöviita, M. Vestberg, J. Tuomi. 2003

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance (2004, background): “1997c; Onguene and Kuyper 2002), mycorrhizal versus nonmycorrhizal or incompatible control plants (Simard et al. 1997a; Lerat et al. 2002; Kytoviita et al. 2003), planting seedlings in mycorrhizal-compatible versus noncompatible plant communities (Horton et al.”
Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and common Pulsatilla species (2004, unknown): “Such an infection by spores may be relatively more beneficial for seedlings than inoculation via intact mycelial network, as in the latter case competitive interactions may overwhelm benefits ( Kytoviita, Vestberg & Tuomi 2003 ).”
Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: Are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? (2004, background): “Along similar lines, Kytöviita et al. (2003) found that inoculation with some AM fungi stimulated growth of seedlings of four native plant species grown at high density, but not when they were competing with larger, established seedlings.”