A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMISTAD-II).
By A. Ross, R. Gibbons, Gregg Stone, R. Kloner, R. Alexander. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
634 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb7157db4201f981b244ab7ae3505a001f493ceb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. (2008, result): “infusion of adenosine was also associated with a reduction in infarct size, but clinical outcomes were not significantly improved (Table 13).(109)”
- Myocardial no-reflow in humans. (2009, neutral): “Adenosine IV (89) 2,118 50 or 70 g/kg/min”
- Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. (2010, background): “adenosine infusion was also associated with a reduction in infarct size, but clinical outcomes were not significantly improved [209].”
- Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target. (2013, neutral): “2005 (105); 2,118 Infusion of adenosine 50 or 70 μg/kg/min No difference in death or HHF at 6 months; post hoc analysis AMISTAD II i.”