Moving least squares response surface approximation: Formulation and metal forming applications
By Piotr Breitkopf, H. Naceur, A. Rassineux, Pierre Villon. 2005
221 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb6bac9ebc8640c6c0e1705458dc946a8f3d06f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Qing Li
- Guangyong Sun
- Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay
- Guangyao Li
- S. Dey
- Sondipon Adhikari
- Xiangyang Cui
- Shiwei Zhou
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Qing Li
- Sondipon Adhikari
- Shiwei Zhou
- Xujing Yang
- Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay
- Guangyong Sun
- Guangyao Li
- S. Dey
In Mechanical Engineering
- Qing Li
- Guangyong Sun
- Guangyao Li
- Zhihui Gong
- Sondipon Adhikari
- Xujing Yang
- Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay
- S. Dey
Citations in the corpus
- Multi-fidelity optimization for sheet metal forming process (2011, methodology): “It has been developed and continuously improved since 1990 ( Breitkopf et al. 2005 ).”
- New concepts for moving least squares: An interpolating non-singular weighting function and weighted nodal least squares (2008, unknown): “in [3], and stochastic analyses, e.”
- Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming (2010, methodology): “[17] developed a new RSM involving Moving Least Squares regression models and pattern search algorithms for achieving uniform thickness, where a one step solver is used in optimization procedure and the incremental solver for final verification.”
- Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come? (2014, unknown): “least squares [77–79].”
- Metamodel based high-fidelity stochastic analysis of composite laminates: A concise review with critical comparative assessment (2017, background): “The local MLS approximation at x is formulated as [20] ~Lðx; xiÞ ¼ bðxiÞTaðxÞ ð65Þ where xi denotes experimental points and the basis functions BðxÞ are commonly chosen as bðxÞ ¼ 1x1 . . . xnx2 . . . x2n T ð66Þ The vector of unknown coefficients aðxÞ is determined by minimizing the error between the”