How Important Is a Neuron?

By Kedar Dhamdhere, Mukund Sundararajan, Qiqi Yan. 2018

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The problem of attributing a deep network's prediction to its \emph{input/base} features is well-studied. We introduce the notion of \emph{conductance} to extend the notion of attribution to the understanding the importance of \emph{hidden} units. Informally, the conductance of a hidden unit of a deep network is the \emph{flow} of attribution via this hidden unit. We use conductance to understand the importance of a hidden unit to the prediction for a specific input, or over a set of inputs. We evaluate the effectiveness of conductance in multiple ways, including theoretical properties, ablation studies, and a feature selection task. The empirical evaluations are done using the Inception network over ImageNet data, and a sentiment analysis network over reviews. In both cases, we demonstrate the effectiveness of conductance in identifying interesting insights about the internal workings of these networks.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Percy Liang
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. William W. Cohen
  6. Kyunghyun Cho
  7. Jianfeng Gao
  8. Martin Jaggi

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Sidak Pal Singh
  3. Martin Jaggi
  4. Zhaopeng Tu
  5. Xing Wang
  6. William W. Cohen

Citations in the corpus