Second-Order Comparison of Gaussian Random Functions and the Geometry of DNA Minicircles
By Victor M. Panaretos, David Kraus, John H. Maddocks. 2010
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb1ae6694267fda0656f5673abe8313192c552e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- H. Muller
- Jeng-Min Chiou
- Jane-ling Wang
- Piotr Kokoszka
- Victor M. Panaretos
- Lajos Horv'ath
- David Kraus
- Theofanis Sapatinas
Citations in the corpus
- Testing the Equality of Covariance Operators in Functional Samples (2011, background): “Panaretos et al. (2010) proposed a test of the type we consider, but assuming that the curves have a Gaussian distribution.”
- Dispersion operators and resistant second-order functional data analysis (2012, methodology): “Using inverse weights induced by Gervini’s (2008) spatial median, Panaretos et al. (2010) identified five unusual curves, possible outliers, and removed them from the analysis of the covariance structure.”
- Selected statistical methods of data analysis for multivariate functional data (2018, background): “Berrenderoa et al. (2011), Jacques and Preda (2014) and Panaretos et al. (2010) discussed principal component analysis for multivariate functional data (MFPCA).”
- Distances and inference for covariance operators (2014, methodology): “Some recent work (Panaretos et al., 2010; Fremdt et al., 2013) has examined testing the equality of covariance structures from two groups of functional curves by defining a test statistic through the Karhunen–Loève expansions of the two covariance structures.”
- Bootstrap-based testing of equality of mean functions or equality of covariance operators for functional data (2016, methodology): “This has motivated many researchers to consider test statistics that are based on finite-dimensional projections, leading to more tractable asymptotic distributions; see Horváth & Kokoszka (2012, Ch. 5), Panaretos et al. (2010) and Fremdt et al. (2012).”
- Testing relevant hypotheses in functional time series via self‐normalization (2018, methodology): “It is worthwhile to mention that the distribution of W is not the same as the one in previous work on self-normalization [see for example Shao (2010) or Shao (2015)] and quantiles of this distribution need to be simulated first.”
- Functional Data Analysis (2016, methodology): “Other two sample tests have been proposed for distributions of functional data (Hall & Van Keilegom 2007) and for covariance functions (Panaretos, Kraus & Maddocks 2010; Boente, Rodriguez & Sued 2011).”