A Cross-Country Analysis of the Bank Supervisory Framework and Bank Performance

By James R. Barth, Daniel E. Nolle, Triphon Phumiwasana, G. Yago. 2003

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb19f89d6d0819351bbd0fd2d5b0782a8cbc1b09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Bank supervision, regulation, and efficiency: evidence from the European Union (2012, methodology): “Furthermore it typically relies on traditional measures of bank efficiency and performance derived from simple accounting ratios (Barth et al., 2003a,b; and Demirguc-Kunt, et al., 2004).”
Bank Regulation, the Quality of Institutions, and Banking Risk in Emerging and Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis (2014, methodology): “The latter result contradicts the conclusion of Barth et al. (2004), who argue that a higher score on the “entry into bank requirements index” increases the likelihood of a banking crisis.”
International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis (2007, unknown): “Same or similar measures have been used in the studies of Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga (2000), Barth et al. (2003a, 2004a), Kasman and Yildirim (2006).”
The impact of banking regulations on banks' cost and profit efficiency: Cross-country evidence (2009, background): “With respect to the power of supervisors, evidence suggests that it is associated with higher levels of nonperforming loans (Barth et al., 2002), it can be harmful to bank development (Barth et al., 2003b) and it is also negatively associated with overall bank soundness (Pasiouras et al., 2006).”
Do European Primarily Internet Banks Show Scale and Experience Efficiencies (2007, unknown): “…after the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in November 1999, United States banks are still more restricted in the securities activities they can engage in, as compared with European banks [see Barth et al. (2003) for comparisons of the permissible range of banking activities across countries].”
The impact of bank regulations, supervision, market structure, and bank characteristics on individual bank ratings: A cross-country analysis (2006, background): “Prior studies have shown that the share of assets in foreign banks is negatively related with the level of non-performing loans 25 (Barth et al., 2002) and positively related with profitability (Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga, 1999; Barth et al., 2002, 2003a ).”
Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence (2007, background): “Compared with the banks’ average capital ratio of 0.13 (see Barth et al., 2003, for a sample of banks from 47 countries), MFIs are much less leveraged, which is explained by the fact that it is more difficult to leverage the risky microfinance loan portfolios (Conning, 1999).”