Direct and mediated anodic oxidation of organic pollutants.

By Marco Panizza, G. Cerisola. Chemical Reviews, 2009

2,160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: today and tomorrow. A review (2014, methodology): “The performance of each process increased using a BDD anode instead of a Pt anode, as expected with the higher oxidizing power of BDD(•OH) compared with Pt(•OH) generated at the corresponding anode surface from water oxidation (Panizza and Cerisola 2009a).”
Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: a review. (2012, background): “The complexity arising from both, the generation of ROS in the AO treatment of non-chloride effluents and chlorine active species when using chloride effluents, makes the degradation rate and current efficiency of these processes to be a function of experimental parameters such as pH, temperature, s”
Influence of the anode material on the degradation of naproxen by Fenton-based electrochemical processes (2016, background): “This is a rather surprising result since it is usually considered that BDD is the most powerful anode for EO [9,15].”
Electrode materials used for electrochemical oxidation of organic compounds in wastewater (2017, neutral): “12–14) that occur with OH radicals (Panizza and Cerisola 2009).”