Efficiency and productivity growth in the banking industry of Central and Eastern Europe

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The sources of bank productivity growth in China during 2002-2009: A disaggregation view (2012, methodology): “…productivity growth is mainly driven by technical change for the American (Alam, 2001; Mukherjee et al., 2001), European, and Japanese banks (e.g., Casu et al., 2004; Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al., 2009; Barros et al., 2010; Assaf et al., 2011) by applying the Malmquist index or Luenberger index.”
A Comparison of Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks 2004 to 2009 (2014, unknown): “, 2002) Central & Eastern Europe (transition economies) Cross-country (Anayiotos et al., 2010; Bonin et al., 2005; Brissimis et al., 2008; Fries and Taci, 2005; Grigorian and Manole, 2006; Kasman and Yildrim, 2006; Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al., 2009; Staikouras et al., 2008; Weill, 2002, 2003; Yild”
Does Deposit Insurance Improve Financial Intermediation? Evidence from the Russian Experiment (2011, background): “This second issue is at least as important as the first, as La Porta et al. (2002) demonstrate: government ownership of banks around the world is pervasive and has negative consequences for financial development and economic growth.”
Banking Sector Performance in Latin America: Market Power Versus Efficiency (2011, methodology): “In the parametric approach, these problems can be reduced by employing a single-step estimation of the frontier and inefficiency equations (see e.g. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al., 2009).”