The road from Mont Pèlerin : the making of the neoliberal thought collective

By Philip Mirowski, D. Plehwe. 2009

1,258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

* Introduction Dieter Plehwe Part I. Origins of National Traditions * French Neoliberalism and Its Divisions: From the Colloque Walter Lippmann to the Fifth Republic Francois Denord * Liberalism and Neoliberalism in Britain, 1930--1980 Keith Tribe * Neoliberalism in Germany: Revisiting the Ordoliberal Foundations of the Social Market Economy Ralf Ptak * The Rise of the Chicago School of Economics and the Birth of Neoliberalism Philip Mirowski and Rob van Horn Part II. Arguing out Strategies on Targeted Topics * The Neoliberals Confront the Trades Unions Yves Steiner * Reinventing Monopoly and the Role of Corporations: Chicago School of Law and Economics Rob van Horn * The Origins of Neoliberal Economic Development Discourse Dieter Plehwe * Business Conservatives and the Mont Pelerin Society Kim Phillips-Fein Part III. Mobilizations for Action * The Influence of Neoliberals in Chile before, during, and after Pinochet Karin Fischer * Taking Aim at the New International Economic Order Jennifer Bair * How Neoliberalism Makes a World: The Urban Property Project in Peru Tim Mitchell * Postface: Defining Neoliberalism Philip Mirowski * Index

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ead6482ad1dd3e4de9da9ba666eacca27248408a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Introduction: critical perspectives on food sovereignty (2014, background): “Those who have the authority or power to dictate the conditions of access are able to circumvent or construct legal frameworks if they choose; indeed, titles may provide a legal means of foreclosure, alienation and expropriation (Mitchell 2009).”
Speaking to the Markets or to the People? A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the EU's Sovereign Debt Crisis (2014, neutral): “While the latter are generally termed ‘neo-liberals’ or ‘ordo-liberals’ (read neo-liberals with rules, a primarily German approach to economics—see Mirowski and Plehwe 2009; Ptak 2009)—the former are often called ‘neo-Keynesians’, although ‘non-neo-liberals’ might be a more accurate term, since it…”
Six theories of neoliberalism (2012, background): “This is the neoliberal ‘thought collective’ that has been widely discussed due to its perceived influence on politics and economics since the 1980s (Mudge 2008; Peck 2008; Mirowski and Plehwe 2009; Dean 2012).”
Neoliberalism as concept (2015, background): “…elements of this ‘proto’-neoliberalism were influential in the making of the Wirtschaftswunder, or economic miracle, of West Germany’s post-war ‘social market economy’ attributed to its Minister for Economics, Ludwig Erhard, (Mirowski & Plehwe, 2009; Peck, 2008; Stedman-Jones, 2012; Turner, 2008).”
The Psychic Life of Neoliberalism: Mapping the Contours of Entrepreneurial Subjectivity (2016, background): “Since the 2007/ 2008 financial crisis, authors have revisited the historical origins of neoliberalism (e.g. Davies, 2014; Gane, 2014a, 2014b; Mirowski and Plehwe, 2009); traced its genesis, persistence and poly-valency (Gilbert, 2013); and explored how neoliberal attitudes have come to inform…”
Neoliberalisation from the Ground Up: Insurgent Capital, Regional Struggle, and the Assetisation of Land (2018, background): “Although work on the ideological apparatus of neoliberalism and its policy transfer mechanisms has gone some way to bridging this gap (Mirowski & Plehwe, 2009; Peck, 2010) there is still a lack of attention to the meso-scale regarding how onthe-ground struggles and strategies have systemically…”
Explaining (with) Neoliberalism (2013, background): “…assemblage, etc.—and although COLLIER (2012, p. 194), for his part, is skeptical that these are ‘reconcilable’ with more structural accounts of neoliberalism, to rule out what could be a fruitful conversation seems like another form of sequestering (cf. MIROWSKI and PLEHWE, 2009; PECK, 2010).”