Development of the standard CubeSat deployer and a CubeSat class PicoSatellite

By J. Puig-Suari. IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings, 2001

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eaca5b97741796694cfb018f591e60729dad6311

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Antonio Iera

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Antonio Iera

Citations in the corpus

• Non-Terrestrial Networks in 5G & Beyond: A Survey (2020, background): “CubeSats, which originally aimed for university and research purposes [102], have been addressed over the years [103], [104].”
• Orbital Edge Computing: Nanosatellite Constellations as a New Class of Computer System (2020, unknown): “A nanosatellite has a mass between 1 kg and 10 kg, often adhering to the “CubeSat” standard [69] to enable use of commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) components and avoid custom deployers [75].”
• The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology. (2017, unknown): “Such an approach is behind the CubeSat concept, introduced by Stanford University and the California Polytechnic State University in 1999 (Puig-Suari et al., 2001).”