Child-Pornography Possessors Arrested in Internet-Related Crimes: Findings From the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study.
By J. Wolak, David Finkelhor, Kimberly J. Mitchell. 2005
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eac4f919b3a568e1e77a0245a8140477bc144d3a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. McCarthy
- M. L. Bourke
- Andres E. Hernandez
- Michael C. Seto
Citations in the corpus
- Internet sexual activity: A comparison between contact and non-contact child pornography offenders (2010, background): “Although Burke et al. (2002) also found that these offenders tended to be in a relationship at the time of their offence(s), Webb et al. (2007) found that 48% of their sample (n 90) were single and Wolak et al. (2005) found that 41% of their sample (n 429) were single and had never been married.”
- The ‘Butner Study’ Redux: A Report of the Incidence of Hands-on Child Victimization by Child Pornography Offenders (2009, background): “…admitted child abusers, and with less than 2% of polygraphed subjects confirmed as “just pictures” offenders, this and other studies (Hernandez 2000; Wolak et al. 2005) call into question whether it is pragmatically, not to mention theoretically, useful to discriminate between “child…”