A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals

By Kristen A. Walker, Andrew W. Trites, M. Haulena, D. Weary. Wildlife research (East Melbourne), 2012

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eab28c638f0d1003e2bf861d37dd2883936e3d1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Hamann
2. S. Maxwell
3. E. Hazen
4. S. Bograd
5. Philippe Gaspar
6. Viola H. Ross‐Smith
7. N. Burton
8. J. Clark

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Viola H. Ross‐Smith
2. N. Burton
3. J. Clark
4. Greg J. Conway
5. Mike Marsh
6. N. Clark
7. C. Thaxter
8. Bj Godley

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Hamann
2. Philippe Gaspar
3. E. Hazen
4. H. Bailey
5. S. Maxwell
6. G. Shillinger
7. Bj Godley
8. S. Bograd

Citations in the corpus

• Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps (2012, background): “A recent review on the effects of marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals highlighted that few studies have investigated the effects of markers on reproduction or growth (Walker et al. 2012).”
• A trial of three harness attachment methods and their suitability for long-term use on Lesser Black-backed Gulls and Great Skuas (2014, methodology): “…the length of time that devices are deployed and thus the attachment method used can all potentially influence the behaviour, physiology, reproduction and survival of birds (Wilson & McMahon 2006, Barron et al 2010, Passos et al 2010, Vandenabeele et al 2011, Walker et al 2012, Bridge et al 2013).”