Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India
By Berta Esteve-Volart. 2004
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea7071a6f4d19445735ffcd0279e22bf49c09c09
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sonali Das
- Stephan Klasen
- Sonali Jain-Chandra
- K. Kochhar
- Janneke Pieters
- Francesca Lamanna
- Saibal Ghosh
- Naresh Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- What Constrains Financial Inclusion for Women? Evidence from Indian Micro data (2017, background): “In the case of India, the evidence suggests that increasing the ratio of female to male managers by 10% could improve per capita output by 2% (Esteve-Volart, 2004).”
- The Impact of Gender Inequality in Education and Employment on Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Updates and Extensions (2008, methodology): “The relatively small theoretical literature on the subject yields conflicting results (e.g. Robert Blecker and Stephanie Seguino 2002; Berta Esteve-Volart 2004; Tiago de Cavalcanti and Jose Tavares 2007).”
- The Output Cost of Gender Discrimination: A Model-Based Macroeconomic Estimate (2008, unknown): “Another possible exception is Esteve-Volart (2004), who focuses on access to the labor market and, in particular, managerial positions, and provides estimates for the cost of discrimination across Indian states. proxy for parental care.”
- Fair Play::More Equal Laws Boost Female Labor Force Participation (2015, background): “Various studies highlight that gender gaps in labor force participation, entrepreneurial activity, and education impede economic growth (Cuberes and Teignier 2014; Esteve-Volart 2004; Klasen and Lamanna 2009).”
- The Impact of Gender Inequality on Economic Performance in Developing Countries (2018, methodology): “At the sub-national level, Berta Esteve-Volart has found significant negative effects of gender gaps in employment a d a age ial positio s o e o o i g o th of I dia s states usi g pa el data a d controlling for endogeneity by using instrumental variables (Esteve-Volart, 2009).”
- Push or Pull? Drivers of Female Labor Force Participation During India's Economic Boom (2012, background): “Given the positive effect female participation can have on economic growth (Esteve-Volart, 2004; Klasen and Lamanna, 2009), drawing women into the labor force can be a significant source of future growth of the Indian economy.”
- Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation: (2013, unknown): “While one line of research focuses on the impact of gender gaps in education and employment on growth (Seguino 2000a, b; Blecker and Seguino 2002; Esteve-Volart 2004; Cavalcanti and Tavares 2007; Klasen 2002; Klasen and Lamanna 2009), another strand of the literature studies on the impact of…”
- Women Workers in India: Why so Few Among so Many? (2015, background): “This literature stresses that gender gaps in labor force participation, entrepreneurial activity, or education act to impede economic growth (e.g. Cuberes and Teignier, 2012, 2014; Esteve-Volart, 2004, and Klasen and Lamanna 2008, among others).”
- The Impact of Gender Inequality in Education and Employment on Economic Growth: New Evidence for a Panel of Countries (2009, background): “At the sub-national level, Esteve-Volart ( 2004 ) has found statistically significant negative effects of gender gaps in employment and managerial positions on economic growth of India's states using panel data and controlling for endogeneity using instrumental variables.”